<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Take a Compiler Course?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.regehr.org/archives/169/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.regehr.org/archives/169</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shuying</title>
		<link>http://blog.regehr.org/archives/169/comment-page-1#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Shuying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.regehr.org/?p=169#comment-734</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t taken the compiler course seriously, because I have never found any course more boring than this in the entire computer science.  Later I tried to understand some compiler reference because I encountered some interesting papers but intensively related to compiler. It turned out that it is as boring as it is always, and those reference are just like what you described:  ESOTERIC! Can&#039;t people shorten the length to explain things directly and clearly? 
Your post is re-motivating me to make up the compiler, and also I am wondering: do you have any reference book or materials or links to share on  compiler?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t taken the compiler course seriously, because I have never found any course more boring than this in the entire computer science.  Later I tried to understand some compiler reference because I encountered some interesting papers but intensively related to compiler. It turned out that it is as boring as it is always, and those reference are just like what you described:  ESOTERIC! Can&#8217;t people shorten the length to explain things directly and clearly?<br />
Your post is re-motivating me to make up the compiler, and also I am wondering: do you have any reference book or materials or links to share on  compiler?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ramblings of a Hatter &#8250; Delicious Bookmarks for June 11th through June 16th</title>
		<link>http://blog.regehr.org/archives/169/comment-page-1#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ramblings of a Hatter &#8250; Delicious Bookmarks for June 11th through June 16th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.regehr.org/?p=169#comment-564</guid>
		<description>[...] Embedded in Academia : Why Take a Compiler Course? - Seconded, or whatever - my compiler course was briefer than I&#039;d have liked but many of my peers didn&#039;t take it and I spent ages explaining what I thought where simple concepts to them when working on group projects and the like. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Embedded in Academia : Why Take a Compiler Course? &#8211; Seconded, or whatever &#8211; my compiler course was briefer than I&#39;d have liked but many of my peers didn&#39;t take it and I spent ages explaining what I thought where simple concepts to them when working on group projects and the like. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

